14WARD 14CANDIDATE VOICES Independent · Nonpartisan

GO DEEPER · POLICY & PRIORITIES · What will you do?

P06 · question 6 of 10

City finances & taxes

Toronto needs better services but has limited money. What would you spend more on, what would you spend less on, and what taxes or fees, if any, would you change?

Quick version: S06 · Would you raise, hold or cut property taxes next year?

Approach & proposed action

Susan Chapelle

I would spend more on reliable transit, preventive infrastructure maintenance and housing linked to health and support services. Residents should see functioning washrooms, cleared sidewalks and maintained parks. Delaying maintenance can turn manageable work into expensive failures, and leaving people in crisis creates costs across emergency services. I would seek reductions in duplicated administration, repeated consultant work where staff capacity would be better value, and discretionary corporate incentives that cannot demonstrate public benefit. Procurement and project management should be reviewed for avoidable overruns. I support proportionate housing application fees. One laneway home should not face the same charges as a sixplex. I would maintain targeted small business relief, examine who receives it and avoid shifting unreasonable costs onto residents through user fees for essential services. I would not promise a tax freeze regardless of service needs. Any proposed property tax change should explain the services it funds, the effect on households and available relief for people struggling to pay. Developers should contribute to growth infrastructure within the law, and other governments must help fund responsibilities that exceed the property tax base. Every major decision needs both an upfront price and its ongoing cost.

Jason Stevens

oppose the province billions on a spa etc to save municipalities

Maria Voutsinas

It is not possible to answer this question before becoming elected as a City Councillor and being able to access detailed budgets, planning documents, revenue forecasts and the like. I commit to performing that due diligence and taking the job seriously, while also engaging with Ward 14 residents to understand their priorities.

Cost & funding

Susan Chapelle

I would separate recurring service costs from capital projects. Permanent staffing needs stable revenue; grants and borrowing cannot simply substitute for operating funding. Capital proposals should include maintenance, replacement and debt costs. I would request quantified savings before allocating money and protect frontline service during reviews. Funding would combine municipal revenue, legally available developer contributions and provincial and federal partnerships. Proportionate fees could reduce some revenue, so their effect must be assessed alongside administrative costs. I would consider necessary property tax changes through the budget process, with clear service commitments and protections for eligible residents facing hardship or financial strain.

Trade-offs & affected groups

Susan Chapelle

Higher service spending benefits residents who depend on transit, housing support and public amenities, but taxes affect household budgets and business costs. Renters can face indirect cost increases. Seniors on fixed incomes and low-income households need consideration. Cutting administration can reduce duplication, but indiscriminate cuts can slow permits, inspections and service delivery. Lower fees help applicants while shifting costs elsewhere. Deferring capital work frees money today but can increase future repair costs and risks. I would assess distributional impacts and service consequences before voting. A balanced budget matters, but so does whether the choices leave residents facing larger costs later.

Authority & feasibility

Susan Chapelle

Council approves budgets and many municipal taxes and fees within provincial law. A councillor can propose changes, request evidence and build support, but cannot independently set the budget or guarantee transfers from other governments. Reviewing fees, procurement and service costs is feasible. Large savings require credible analysis and may take time to realize. Infrastructure investment is constrained by staffing, construction capacity and approved financing. I would use the budget process to compare options, challenge weak business cases and identify obligations. Where a service depends on provincial funding, I would pursue agreements while explaining what the City can sustain without them.

Supporting sources

Susan Chapelle

Toronto Long-Term Financial Plan, updated 2023, on sustainable revenue and multi-year decisions. City of Toronto 2026 Budget Summary, on operating and capital allocations. TTC operating and capital budget materials, on recurring service costs and infrastructure needs. Toronto Small Business Property Tax Subclass guidance, on targeted relief. Strong Towns infrastructure costing framework, on future maintenance and replacement obligations.

Responded, but not to this question

Denise Walcott

No response yet

Maqsood Ahmad · Sara Ehrhardt · George Fawcett · Mary Fragedakis · John Kladitis · Michael Mitchell · Caryma Sa'd · Dianne Saxe · Devyn Stackhouse · Christiane Tetreault